Consider the value of McDonald's logo, the Golden Arches. Any copycat opening a hamburger restaurant using McDonald's colors and the shapes of its trademarked images would surely increase consumer acceptance of its burgers. Trademarks protect a company's colors and shapes, provided that they serve no purpose other than to identify the source of the goods and services. If it can be proven in a court of law that the colors and shapes serve a function - for example if the Golden Arches color became strictly associated with healthy food items with less than 300 calories and no transfat - then that functionality would make the trademark open for challenge by copycats. In the July 28, 2003 edition of The National Law Journal, Jeffrey L. Eichen cites the pink color of Pepto Bismol as a case in point. No trademark is enforceable on Pepto Bismol pink because its color was ruled as soothing to someone with an upset stomach and is therefore functional.
As American basketball player Ariel McDonald found out when he starred in an Israeli commercial for Burger King, copycats need to tread carefully on pretty well McAnything, McAnywhere. In the TV skit, Ariel is allowed to enter a Burger King restaurant only after he removes his basketball shirt labelled with his name McDONALD. The player then appears wearing a jersey bearing the Burger King mark and says "Listen to McDonald: Burger King is the one." McDonald's responded with a commercial of its own, featuring a previously published magazine interview in which player McDonald said that he enjoyed life in Tel Aviv and dined at McDonald's.
The player sued McDonald's for using his name and quotations from the magazine without his authorization. Micky Dee launched a countersuit, arguing that the Burger King commercial infringed on the McDonald's trademark, damaged company goodwill, and constituted both false advertising and unjust enrichment.
Israel's Supreme Court decided in favour of McDonald's. The court ruled that Ariel McDonald's name and statements in the magazine article were freely made and that the world's largest fast-food restaurant chain had a right to use the magazine interview in response to Ariel's comments in the Burger King commercial. And although the player has a right to use his name, it is not an absolute right particularly where one is gaining economic benefit at the expense of a business competitor.
McDonald's brand faced a more anatomical association when an Australian restaurant featured topless wenches serving under the name McTits. McDonald's deep legal resources immediately fired off a cease-and-desist order.
McDonald's is just as tenacious in defending its trademarks in cyberspace. Micky Dee's legal machine successfully shut down the website www.mcmurder.com, citing unauthorized and misleading use of McDonald's trademarks including the Golden Arches logo, the McDonald's mark and the Ronald McDonald character. Although mcmurder.com purports to be a humorous site, McDonald's successfully argued that an unsuspecting consumer wouldn't be able to distinguish the humour in the website's false allegations that McDonald's is systematically murdering people in Los Angeles and New York City on behalf of the United Nations. Big Mac also cited unproven claims of harassment and abuse against the company. The website has been forced to predominantly feature McDonald's legal cease-and-desist order on its home page. That order asserts that while America's First Amendment affords the right to free speech, it doesn't protect the gratuitous and deceptive use of trademarks as mcmurder.com does.
McDonald's has even gone after the Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary when it included the term McJob, defined as low-paying and dead-end work. No less than McDonald's CEO Jim Cantalupo wrote an open letter to Merriam-Webster, arguing that the term is an inaccurate description of restaurant employment and insults the 12 million workers in the restaurant industry. McDonald's legal team advised Merriam-Webster of impending legal action, pointing out that McJOBS is the trademarked name for McDonald's training program aimed at mentally and physically challenged people.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wow!
ReplyDeleteIn the movie "Coming to American" (featuring Eddie Murphy and Arsenio Hall), there was a restaurant who copied itself after McDonald's and there was a scene when the owner chased off a photographer trying to get pictures as evidence in a law suit against them. The name was "McDowell's" and instead of "golden arches" they had the "golden arcs",etc.
It made fun of the food chain so I guess it's ok. LOL. But, it went on to say that the owner made his fortune copying off of McDonald's business plan and would clearly be "trademark infringement".
With that said, What happened when the show Grey's Anatomy starting using the terms "McDreamy" and "McSteamy"? Did McDonald's try to sue them? I'd think not since it was used complimentarily (is <--- that a word?). Anyway..
I think the McRib is safe though. I havent found anyone who's been able to make boneless ribs yet. :-)
Apparently Ronald and his legal team doesn’t mess around when it comes to McInfringement. In all the cases, I can definitely see their grounds for a lawsuit, and it is not surprising that the judgments went in their favor. Although the company is most likely unable to register the prefix “Mc,” I suppose, as in these cases, certain uses of the prefix “Mc” would indeed be infringement.
ReplyDeleteBe careful Jamie, you might become a Mctarget yourself with comments like that. That's pretty crazy that nowadays you can sue people for stuff like that dictionary entry. If it made it into the dictionary, it has obviously come to take on a different meaning by the time it gets there. I guess if people at McDonald's were payed better, maybe the McJob wouldn't have such a bad connotation.
ReplyDeleteI forgot about the Eddie Murphy movie, he put a hot tub in that apartment! I can't believe they didn't get sued for that one. But, it's pretty ironic that the whole reason it's in the movie is to portray a real McJob, Eddie was slummin' it with the mop. Merriam's should have been able to keep it now that I think about it.
Dave